Comments on: The "Main Tank" Conundrum http://lore.ftwgaming.com/2008/03/10/the-main-tank-conundrum/ Tue, 07 Feb 2012 06:23:23 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8 hourly 1 By: Galoheart http://lore.ftwgaming.com/2008/03/10/the-main-tank-conundrum/comment-page-1/#comment-95 Galoheart Thu, 20 Mar 2008 11:11:00 +0000 http://lorelol.wordpress.com/2008/03/10/the-main-tank-conundrum/#comment-95 A good post. I like having a Tank Corp of all or most being very caparable tanks if needed but just all working togeather to get the job done for the common good of the raid. <br/><br/>In our guild though small, we have 2 main guild dedicated tank. We don't have a named tank thats a designated in name a MT or OT in name title. We both raid togeather and we just fill the position we normally fill and just works that way. Both tanks work togeather, both respect each other as tanks and we don't have any drama to speak of. A good post. I like having a Tank Corp of all or most being very caparable tanks if needed but just all working togeather to get the job done for the common good of the raid.

In our guild though small, we have 2 main guild dedicated tank. We don’t have a named tank thats a designated in name a MT or OT in name title. We both raid togeather and we just fill the position we normally fill and just works that way. Both tanks work togeather, both respect each other as tanks and we don’t have any drama to speak of.

]]>